1996-07-18 - Re: Surf-filter lists

Header Data

From: Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
To: “Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Message Hash: a44eb25d78c6a692ec6b40c4d28e2bff04a3a3a41d1c246a679ac1424027189e
Message ID: <31ED710A.1756@vail.tivoli.com>
Reply To: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960717142418.2660A-100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-18 08:54:24 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 16:54:24 +0800

Raw message

From: Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 16:54:24 +0800
To: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Subject: Re: Surf-filter lists
In-Reply-To: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960717142418.2660A-100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Message-ID: <31ED710A.1756@vail.tivoli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Robert A. Hayden wrote:

> <rant>A Private organization cannot "censor" anything.  The fundamental
> definition of the word require some agent of the government take action
> to censor.  

I think you need a new dictionary.  I don't see any reason why I shouldn't
use the word "censor" to describe the action of a parent clipping articles
from "Weekly Reader", for example.

Whether some instance of censorship is interesting in a legal sense of
course hinges on whether a government is involved.

______c_____________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX    * For the time being,
       m5@tivoli.com * m101@io.com          *    
      <URL:http://www.io.com/~m101>         *    three heads and eight arms.





Thread