1996-07-17 - Re: Surf-filter lists

Header Data

From: declan@well.com (Declan McCullagh)
To: frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu
Message Hash: aba8602ecfd4372c7c849cc845627f5c677dd40d9b233578d6d2d5623a8a90f7
Message ID: <v01510103ae11a1bfffcd@[204.62.128.229]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-17 18:37:19 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 02:37:19 +0800

Raw message

From: declan@well.com (Declan McCullagh)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 02:37:19 +0800
To: frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu
Subject: Re: Surf-filter lists
Message-ID: <v01510103ae11a1bfffcd@[204.62.128.229]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Vlad: How can consumers make an informed decision as to which filter
>they wish to purchase, if they are not told exactly what information
>each product is filtering out?
>
>Meeks et al may be guilty of flamboyant, emotionalistic prose, but I
>find the concept that the public is expected to buy various filters
>without knowing what they filter...frankly, ridiculous.


Flamboyant prose? Moi? Never!

More to the point, as I wrote at the end of the original CWD, it's a
bait-and-switch maneuver. Go after porn, they say, but the censor political
information.

And you don't know about it.

-Declan







Thread