1996-08-13 - non-secure network utilities - pointers?
Header Data
From: Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.Berkeley.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 574a84fc054dbc01b6139f8b36aced2942bdb892997dec4b97e37d3edda3f575
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960813010527.1025D-100000@quesnay.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-13 11:45:55 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 19:45:55 +0800
Raw message
From: Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 19:45:55 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: non-secure network utilities - pointers?
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960813010527.1025D-100000@quesnay.Berkeley.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
What cypherpunk-approved (tm) -- that is, cryptographically strong,
freely available, and well-implemented (reliable) -- network utilities are
available? I'm willing to agree to US-only license agreement iff I have
to...
I'm looking for secure telnet, ftp, talk, etc. that I can run over a
potentially insecure network (and their respective daemons).
Is SSL the way to go? (If so, what's the best implementation?) What
about other protocols? Is there some comprehensive {web,ftp}site
where I can find more information on this subject?
Please reply off-list to poodge@econ.berkeley.edu
thanks,
-sq
Thread
Return to August 1996
- Return to “=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@stallion.ee>”
- Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”
Return to “Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.Berkeley.EDU>”
- 1996-08-13 (Tue, 13 Aug 1996 19:45:55 +0800) - non-secure network utilities - pointers? - Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.Berkeley.EDU>
- 1996-08-13 (Wed, 14 Aug 1996 00:42:28 +0800) - Re: non-secure network utilities - pointers? - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@stallion.ee>
- 1996-08-14 (Thu, 15 Aug 1996 02:57:31 +0800) - Re: non-secure network utilities - pointers? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>