From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@stallion.ee>
To: Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.Berkeley.EDU>
Message Hash: cfd492958c35cbd32ae620b514eae3dee3ba58998c2242e24f97631ece005470
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.93.960813125009.13713E-100000@nebula.online.ee>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960813010527.1025D-100000@quesnay.Berkeley.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-13 16:42:28 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 00:42:28 +0800
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@stallion.ee>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 00:42:28 +0800
To: Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: Re: non-secure network utilities - pointers?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960813010527.1025D-100000@quesnay.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.93.960813125009.13713E-100000@nebula.online.ee>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Tue, 13 Aug 1996, Sam Quigley wrote:
> I'm looking for secure telnet, ftp, talk, etc. that I can run over a
> potentially insecure network (and their respective daemons).
SSH is one way to go, as besides secure rlogin and rsh you can also set up
secure encrypted tunnels between hosts for different applications, like X
or some other TCP/IP apps.
Have a look at http://www.ssh.fi/
SSLtelnet/SSLftp are an other option.
Jüri Kaljundi
AS Stallion
jk@stallion.ee
Return to August 1996
Return to “Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.Berkeley.EDU>”