1996-08-14 - Re: non-secure network utilities - pointers?
Header Data
From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.berkeley.edu>
Message Hash: 75287a564352fa1d0d08969c80242e41bb0c6c0425c65df5a53de881a2f6c076
Message ID: <199608141527.LAA21142@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960813010527.1025D-100000@quesnay.Berkeley.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-14 18:57:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 02:57:31 +0800
Raw message
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 02:57:31 +0800
To: Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: non-secure network utilities - pointers?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960813010527.1025D-100000@quesnay.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <199608141527.LAA21142@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sam Quigley writes:
> What cypherpunk-approved (tm) -- that is, cryptographically strong,
> freely available, and well-implemented (reliable) -- network utilities are
> available? I'm willing to agree to US-only license agreement iff I have
> to...
Try SSH and friends -- they are a pretty good thing.
http://www.ssh.fi/, I believe.
Perry
Thread
Return to August 1996
- Return to “=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@stallion.ee>”
- Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”
Return to “Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.Berkeley.EDU>”
- 1996-08-13 (Tue, 13 Aug 1996 19:45:55 +0800) - non-secure network utilities - pointers? - Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.Berkeley.EDU>
- 1996-08-13 (Wed, 14 Aug 1996 00:42:28 +0800) - Re: non-secure network utilities - pointers? - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@stallion.ee>
- 1996-08-14 (Thu, 15 Aug 1996 02:57:31 +0800) - Re: non-secure network utilities - pointers? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>