From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Message Hash: c45b3d1dd06b8d4d931e7807d10d6aa889828753234387e676f9e5a7ab7ded69
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960802164703.1649B-100000@smoke.suba.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960802005945.11780D-100000@larry.infi.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-03 01:15:09 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 3 Aug 1996 09:15:09 +0800
From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 1996 09:15:09 +0800
To: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Subject: Re: A Libertine Question
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960802005945.11780D-100000@larry.infi.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960802164703.1649B-100000@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Alan Horowitz wrote:
> We require property owners who don't have city-sewage hookups, to install
> their septic tanks and maintain them in certain defined configurations
> which estop them from contaminating the neighbor's well. I don't know if
> that's a good idea or not - but I haven't seen sentiment against sewage
> regulation of property owners.
> So why should we be terribly upset about an ordinance which makes it
> illegal to operate a residential kitchen and a residential sewge-disposal
> operation in a city park or a city sidewalk?
As long as you are enforcing it on everyone, I don't think you'd have a
problem, but to force some one from cooking food for homeless people, and
allow a family barbeque, is IMO wrong. If it is unsafe/unsanitary to cook
food in a certain way, it is unsafe/unsanitary. Selective enforcement is
wrong.
Force the yuppies on a sunday afternoon barbeque to get a permit and
see how long the law lasts.
Petro, Christopher C.
petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff>
snow@smoke.suba.com
Return to August 1996
Return to “snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>”