1996-09-17 - Re: Workers Paradise. /Political rant.

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Message Hash: 8d3eaaa0d0d563567c6e3d78a4bb0eb97d7bddf2e3992a1b80b2319f6542a934
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960916125640.11930A-100000@polaris>
Reply To: <199609160537.HAA26159@basement.replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-17 00:14:41 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 08:14:41 +0800

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 08:14:41 +0800
To: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Subject: Re: Workers Paradise. /Political rant.
In-Reply-To: <199609160537.HAA26159@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960916125640.11930A-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 16 Sep 1996, Anonymous wrote:

> Tim May wrote:
> 
> > The thing about _traditional_ charity, of the religious or community sort,
> > was that it was not treated as an "entitlement," as something the resentful
> > masses could "demand" as part of their "human rights."
> 
>    There's no substantial difference between their resentful whining about
> their rights

Such as the "right" to health insurance, the "right" to free checks for
sitting on one's chair, the "right" to be treated preferentially as
equally qualified non-minorities applying to the same job, the "right" to
housing, the "right" to free education, the "right" to be paid three times
what your labor is worth in the lowest bracket jobs.

> and your resentful whining about your rights

The right to personal property.

Beginning to get the picture?

All of the former were created in the last 60 years out of whole cloth
more as "revolution insurance" than anything else.  They are rights
because someone said they were, not because they are well or logically
grounded.

> - except maybe that you whine more.

I should hope he does.

--
I hate lightning - finger for public key - Vote Monarchist
unicorn@schloss.li






Thread