cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-09-27 - Re: ssh - How widely used?

Header Data

From: Chad Dougherty <chad@lycos.com>
To: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Message Hash: c44d829183ab036b1e7d861be99bdcf41fc6319f23d3d890b8f2075ad1773e67
Message ID: <199609270608.CAA24129@rat.eng.lycos.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960926174203.498E-100000@polaris>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-27 08:35:10 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 16:35:10 +0800

Raw message

From: Chad Dougherty <chad@lycos.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 16:35:10 +0800
To: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Subject: Re: ssh - How widely used?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960926174203.498E-100000@polaris>
Message-ID: <199609270608.CAA24129@rat.eng.lycos.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Adam Shostack writes:
 > 	Theres a windows version, mac is under vauge development.  SSH
 > is pretty cool, but the code base is somewhat messy, and its shows
 > signs of its origins in things like systems calls not having their
 > return values checked.
 > 
 > 	Despite all this, I use it, like it, and recomend it for use
 > in systems not likely to come under attack by professionals.
 > 
 > Adam
 > 

Why do you say "not likely to come under attack by professionals"?
Have you found security holes in it?

	-Chad

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.3, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBMktvVTa/vRyBMxWdAQGRsAP+PbjVCYB0FrNTY6CUCH/D5BZ02gczvMzQ
1kdlf7Lcx+GcyAosaJXgovJpA/UcIq/ShIELtuvZQNqB3JVLCL3RvYbQ0vf5o6wI
QEnL5gS8uEetr2C7U/Pt2lqkwv0PTQYv/O7uKjVFAd36p0aRrbQJOkX6LpKNbbYi
oDk5B9XgbK4=
=4aWj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Thread