1996-09-27 - Re: ssh - How widely used?

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: unicorn@schloss.li (Black Unicorn)
Message Hash: d34ebb9292d220d0fea722ef61918109e8ff4104581da13b62d55e000fdd1f00
Message ID: <199609270039.TAA05797@homeport.org>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960926174203.498E-100000@polaris>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-27 02:02:27 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 10:02:27 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 10:02:27 +0800
To: unicorn@schloss.li (Black Unicorn)
Subject: Re: ssh - How widely used?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960926174203.498E-100000@polaris>
Message-ID: <199609270039.TAA05797@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


	Theres a windows version, mac is under vauge development.  SSH
is pretty cool, but the code base is somewhat messy, and its shows
signs of its origins in things like systems calls not having their
return values checked.

	Despite all this, I use it, like it, and recomend it for use
in systems not likely to come under attack by professionals.

Adam

Black Unicorn wrote:

| Does anyone know if there are MS-Dos or Mac versions of the ssh client?
| How much is ssh used?
| 
| I've not seen much discussion of it but poking around an ISP yielded this:
| 
|        Ssh  (Secure  Shell)  a  program for logging into a remote
|        machine and for executing commands in  a  remote  machine.
|        It  is  intended  to  replace  rlogin and rsh, and provide
|        secure  encrypted  communications  between  two  untrusted
|        hosts over an insecure network.  X11 connections and arbi-
|        trary TCP/IP ports can also be forwarded over  the  secure
|        channel.

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume






Thread