1996-11-15 - Re: Members of Parliament Problem

Header Data

From: Jim McCoy <mccoy@communities.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 180417dc5ce08b96ce6ef4d5756ba06d7d8a64826a111242658753dbab8e8fba
Message ID: <v03007807aeb2ac971fb2@[205.162.51.35]>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9611151034.A15706-0100000@netcom14>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-15 23:36:18 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 15:36:18 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Jim McCoy <mccoy@communities.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 15:36:18 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Members of Parliament Problem
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9611151034.A15706-0100000@netcom14>
Message-ID: <v03007807aeb2ac971fb2@[205.162.51.35]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I wrote:
>[...] There are also systems in which group or subset of a group is
>necessary to sign the message, the original work was by Yves Desmet in his
>paper "Social Cryptography" in Crypto 88 or 89 I think.

Correction:  That should have been "Society and Group Oriented
Cryptography: A new approach" by Yves Desmedt in Crypto '87  [It
was sitting next to my desk and I was too lazy to reach over and
check...sigh.]  This particular paper deals with groups recieving
messages and requiring a subset to decrypt, a later paper by Desmedt
(or maybe Desmedt and Yao) deals with the signature system I
described.

jim








Thread