1996-11-16 - Re: Members of Parliament Problem

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)
Message Hash: e925036205754fafdd9332743d8c61259e9a7080800f14a969b64662fdd8ae4a
Message ID: <199611161321.IAA03313@homeport.org>
Reply To: <v03007804aeb2a16c7fc4@[205.162.51.35]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-16 13:44:06 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 05:44:06 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 05:44:06 -0800 (PST)
To: mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)
Subject: Re: Members of Parliament Problem
In-Reply-To: <v03007804aeb2a16c7fc4@[205.162.51.35]>
Message-ID: <199611161321.IAA03313@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Jim McCoy wrote:
| Lucky writes:

For the record, this was Peter Hendrickson, not me.

| >> At 9:32 AM 11/15/1996, Adam Shostack wrote:
| >> I've been toying with schemes that multiply the Ns from everybody's
| >> public key to create a new semi-anonymous public key.  The only
| >> problem is that in each case either identity is revealed or the
| >> person seeking semi-anonymously reveals their secret key.  So,
| >> I am not quite there.  ;-)
| >
| >I think that Chaum wrote some papers on group signatures. I'll try to dig
| >them out. But it probably won't be before Sunday.

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume










Thread