1996-11-06 - Re: Censorship on cypherpunks

Header Data

From: furballs <furballs@netcom.com>
To: “Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM” <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Message Hash: 2f071ecbc8ffa8c00b8d84dc8bfc5b928a52928e2dfb44f7d09bba1d9bd2b607
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9611061214.A13085-0100000@netcom>
Reply To: <BP3ywD23w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-06 21:28:27 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 13:28:27 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: furballs <furballs@netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 13:28:27 -0800 (PST)
To: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: Censorship on cypherpunks
In-Reply-To: <BP3ywD23w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9611061214.A13085-0100000@netcom>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed, 6 Nov 1996, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:

> furballs <furballs@netcom.com> writes:
> > As for the original point on Vulis:
> >
> > John Gimore did what he did. Vulis challenged him, and John called his
> > bluff. Having read this list for quite a while now, I've seen alot of
> > crap go back and forth from many people that was just as annoying as what
> > Vulis was doing.
> I'm slightly offended by this.  What if someone were to post the entire text
> of the _Pink _Swastika to this mailing list, in 40K chunks, with the subject
> header "John Gilmore and Hitler's rise to power"? :-)

You missed the original point. Posting spam is one thing; directly 
challenging the list owner to stop you from posting is another matter.