From: Jamie Lawrence <foodie@netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 17:04:56 -0800 (PST)
To: "Matthew J. Miszewski" <mjmiski@execpc.com>
Subject: Re: Ebonics
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19961221180621.006965f0@mail.execpc.com>
Message-ID: <v03007805aee23879c5dd@[10.0.2.15]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Matt,

Are you honestly arguing that a system of communication
acknoledged and taught in a public school is satisfying
a 'need or desire to communicate in a private way"?

Or that Ebonics has anything to do with communicating
in the presence of a police officer?

Or that either of the above has anything to do with crypto?

If so, then I think you've said more than enough.

-j, who would like to note that nothing about my viewpoint on
Ebonics has been stated in this message.


At 6:06 PM -0600 on 12/21/96, Matthew J. Miszewski wrote:

> Crypto angle, here?  Much of Ebonics has been based upon a need or desire
> to communicate in a private way.  "5-0" was initiated as a way to
> communicate the presence of a police officer.  Surely, we are not arguing
> against the development of a low-level way to scramble language.  Or in
> fact, are you arguing that attempts to curtail the police should *not* be
> encouraged?  This seems odd coming from some members of the list (Collapse
> of Governments and all) ;-).
>
> Matt

--
"I'm about to, or I am going to, die. Either expression is used."
                - Last words of Dominique Bouhours, Grammarian, 1702
____________________________________________________________________
Jamie Lawrence                                     foodie@netcom.com