From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 17:26:42 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Ebonics
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19961221180621.006965f0@mail.execpc.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961221202657.1541A-100000@gak.voicenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sat, 21 Dec 1996, Matthew J. Miszewski wrote:

> Why is it that personal freedom, sometimes expressed by choice of dialect
> or language, seemingly has such arbitrary limits?  Many on the list
> complain that they are subject to too many rules, and yet, seem to chime in
> on multi-linugual issues in this way.

I never said that the government should force people to speak a certain
language.  You are missing the main point: How do you expect to communicate
with an employee who can't speak any language that you can understand?  It's
not arbitrary at all.  In fact, it's rather simple.

Mark
- -- 
finger -l for PGP key
PGP encrypted mail prefered.
0xf9b22ba5 now revoked

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBMryPECzIPc7jvyFpAQFLJwgAw2Y64kvmBQdVPQY4DUsf36iKEd2ZqgbU
n+TCETMfG79hzJ1DgtvuLHhaOeKqQv2pLalLK6y//DVEllk/25f/iv+YQRb/RgD5
lpHw3CV8ZAgUk8563VK9V3x7sKv6D0wXYGdgUln9DnYnIYKebdhEWgDj19tuy96x
j2FL0OGa0sLqx2lazaCATSLQtHqFARqGTKUTib0bpQj3Qougz929xmWjVhRTWVlD
qFFI3QCy7g934uwk+LRhmVgOuCk4u3/Tg8ZAZYbPKT05Tibsbeazd7NnJnT0b3aG
/0FrDKPDXQQo4wFY4Bd93jdp2kvXiHCggC5bQsazG9vvFM3igMBpwA==
=ZG97
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----