cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-01-20 - Re: Sandy and the Doc

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7e3e2086e1d75d83e00f625a1402e00f1e65b4b7f52b468e15fe01ff23ff292a
Message ID: <32E2DBA6.12D8@gte.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970119094124.16633B-100000@crl9.crl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-20 02:43:23 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 18:43:23 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 18:43:23 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Sandy and the Doc
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970119094124.16633B-100000@crl9.crl.com>
Message-ID: <32E2DBA6.12D8@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 1997, Dale Thorn wrote:
> > Your/Gilmore's *renaming* of the original list, and co-opting of the
> > *original* name for the edited list is prima facie evidence of bad
> > faith,...

> Sophist, paranoid nonsense.  This one-month test is of a
> moderated *Cypherpunks* list.  So there was no renaming.
> The unedited list was a gimme for cry babies such as Dale.

Lookie here, folks.  This is the flaming jerk who'll be editing your
posts to the list.  Note that we have a NEW admission from the Sandy
man: the unedited list was NOT in fact a given.  BTW, John Gilmore
says just the opposite.

> When the test is complete, things will go back to the previous
> status if that's what folks want.  If not, Cypherpunks will
> continue as a moderated list (of some sort, further test may be
> conducted if list members want).

Again, contrary to Gilmore's statement(s).  Who is this guy, and is
he taking over Gilmore's persona or something?

Thread