cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-01-19 - Re: Sandy and the Doc

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Message Hash: 8e5c435b08074815a718daba45ac943e1ccb667fbef39e5b8a759e34a6379c77
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970118201607.10538D-100000@crl10.crl.com>
Reply To: <32E19F4B.28A0@sk.sympatico.ca>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-19 04:25:24 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 20:25:24 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 20:25:24 -0800 (PST)
To: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: Sandy and the Doc
In-Reply-To: <32E19F4B.28A0@sk.sympatico.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970118201607.10538D-100000@crl10.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C'punks,

On Sat, 18 Jan 1997, Toto wrote:

>  I am finding it hard to understand how the same people who
> seemed dedicated to silencing Dr. DV K on this list can
> then turn around and 'correct' him, or 'add to' his comments,
> or 'one-up' him in the insult department.

Correcting is not an insult.  His statement was incorrect or
incomplete.  I corrected it.  His comment was on topic, though
in error.  My correction was on topic.  He was not "silenced" in
any way.  Toto's proposition, therefore, does not make sense to me.

Contrary to several peoples erroneous assumptions, there will be
no flaming--of anyone--on the moderated list.  When moderation is
under weigh, I will do nothing to restrain flaming on the flame
and unedited lists.  Toto's prejudice (in the literal sense of the
word, i.e., "to pre-judge") is showing.


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thread