From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: f0c38e42fe28a31f0b36b86f6b9152fd5eb78e1cd715363f2f207e6b25135482
Message ID: <3.0.1.32.19970517022756.005b2608@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199705140034.TAA23384@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-17 15:37:33 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 May 1997 23:37:33 +0800
From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 1997 23:37:33 +0800
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: The Interlinked Cypherpunks Lists? (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199705140034.TAA23384@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970517022756.005b2608@popd.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 06:50 PM 5/13/97 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>Instead, imagine this "service":
>- a distribution point (= list) which subscribes to all of the various
>lists (cyberpass, algebra, ssz, etc.)
>- it sends out to subscribers the first instance of any message it receives
>- duplicates (see discussion below) would not be sent
>- it would, ideally, be on a robust machine
As a filtering service, it would be great, though most of the duplicates
I see are articles posted on one or more of (cypherpunks, coderpunks,
cryptography), and I'd see a few more dups if I read alt.cypherpunks
regularly.
On the other hand, one of the reasons we have multiple list servers
is to reduce the risk of a single cypherpunks list site dying again
(as well as just the effect of several people volunteering at once.)
A filter site is a single point of failure, though it's a less serious
failure if there are still multiple lists feeding it.
If the filter can set the headers appropriately so that the
author and originating-list information still works,
then it matters even less if it goes down.
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp
# (If this is a mailing list, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.)
Return to May 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”