cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-06-07 - Re: Responses to “Spam costs and questions” (long)

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
To: “Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM” <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Message Hash: 31ee0218b5879268a007a2d8a22602408c2be63e4133405dbeac88e9b73472f6
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970606223724.14349A-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
Reply To: <P4gw8D26w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-07 02:53:20 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 10:53:20 +0800

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 10:53:20 +0800
To: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: Responses to "Spam costs and questions" (long)
In-Reply-To: <P4gw8D26w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970606223724.14349A-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



So we do agree after all!

-Declan

(Who thinks that no consensual speech should be banned by the government.
I can, however, see a common law argument for spam as trespass after
repeated cease-and-desist notes are sent.)

On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:

> Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com> writes:
> > I suspect we agree on spam.)
> 
> I kind of doubt it.
> 
> Do you believe, as I do, that "spam" deserves the protection as any other kind
> of speech, and that so libel, child pornography, and bolb-making instructions?
> 
> I didn't think so. :-)
> 
> ---
> 
> Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
> Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
> 
>

Thread