1997-06-06 - Re: Responses to “Spam costs and questions” (long)

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5ef0b86f7dfdee96a64c11929ac61054136f3f94cda72249c1da59d093708c57
Message ID: <P4gw8D26w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970606111448.3131B-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-06 23:51:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 07:51:49 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 07:51:49 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Responses to "Spam costs and questions" (long)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970606111448.3131B-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
Message-ID: <P4gw8D26w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com> writes:
> I suspect we agree on spam.)

I kind of doubt it.

Do you believe, as I do, that "spam" deserves the protection as any other kind
of speech, and that so libel, child pornography, and bolb-making instructions?

I didn't think so. :-)

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps






Thread