1997-06-13 - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly

Header Data

From: Jeff Barber <jeffb@issl.atl.hp.com>
To: declan@pathfinder.com
Message Hash: 431bf38b2a9cb13a1f99134fe79bb1ee635e65f64635329dc7c7916f7f07c4cb
Message ID: <199706131550.LAA30964@jafar.issl.atl.hp.com>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970613105505.13113D-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-13 15:56:18 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 23:56:18 +0800

Raw message

From: Jeff Barber <jeffb@issl.atl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 23:56:18 +0800
To: declan@pathfinder.com
Subject: Re: There's no general right to privacy -- get over it, from Netly
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970613105505.13113D-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
Message-ID: <199706131550.LAA30964@jafar.issl.atl.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Declan McCullagh writes:
> 
> I suspect the scare about privacy has led to muddled thinking.

I agreed with the point of your article, though you might have been
more careful when uttering the magic word "right".


> I'm surprised not to hear more from other folks here: my position is one
> cypherpunks have advocated for years -- controlling what data flow from my
> computer is my responsibility.

I completely agree with your position.  I assumed the lack of reaction
was simply because you're preaching to the choir here.


-- Jeff

Thread

• Return to June 1997

• Return to “Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>”
• Return to “dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)”
• Return to “Jeff Barber <jeffb@issl.atl.hp.com>”
• Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>”
• Return to “Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>”
• Return to “Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>”
• Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”
• Return to “tzeruch@ceddec.com”

• Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”

• 1997-06-12 (Fri, 13 Jun 1997 07:20:30 +0800) - There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
  • 1997-06-13 (Fri, 13 Jun 1997 23:34:16 +0800) - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
    • 1997-06-13 (Fri, 13 Jun 1997 23:56:18 +0800) - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Jeff Barber <jeffb@issl.atl.hp.com>
    • 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:04:28 +0800) - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
      • 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:23:14 +0800) - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
        • 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:54:18 +0800) - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
        • 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 03:04:10 +0800) - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - tzeruch@ceddec.com
          • 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 08:12:11 +0800) - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
    • 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 08:04:02 +0800) - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
  • 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:00:44 +0800) - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 04:40:25 +0800) - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly (fwd) - Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>