From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
To: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Message Hash: c6768aee2b05f9a3f2334b207b0f4a6bbd0546d90a4c4f4b83046cc1c7ea2fef
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970613105505.13113D-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
Reply To: <199706122248.RAA11848@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-13 15:34:16 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 23:34:16 +0800
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 23:34:16 +0800
To: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Subject: Re: There's no general right to privacy -- get over it, from Netly
In-Reply-To: <199706122248.RAA11848@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970613105505.13113D-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I suspect the scare about privacy has led to muddled thinking.
Free speech is a right that strictly limits the government's ability to
control what you say. We should have a similar right of privacy from the
government.
But I give up my free speech "rights" when I attend a college with a wacky
speech code or go to work at a company with workplace speech policies. My
choices in those situations are governed by my free speech preferences.
Similarly, I give up my privacy "rights" when I go to unknown web sites,
apply for a loan, or post to Usenet, etc. These also are preferences.
I'm surprised not to hear more from other folks here: my position is one
cypherpunks have advocated for years -- controlling what data flow from my
computer is my responsibility.
-Declan
On Thu, 12 Jun 1997, Jim Choate wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Forwarded message:
>
> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 18:58:37 -0400
> > From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
> > Subject: There's no general right to privacy -- get over it, from Netly
>
> > likes to say "Privacy is not an absolute right, but a
> > fundamental right." But in truth, privacy is not a
> > right but a preference: Some people want more of it
> > than others.
>
> A right is not a question of popularity or amplitude, it is a question of
> existance. It is or it isn't. Some people want more guns than others
> (obvious even to you) so you seriously hold that there is no fundamental
> Constitutional right to own firearms? Or speech, we don't all want to use it
> to the same amount, we therefore don't have a right to free speech? Or (oh
> my god!) crypto, we don't all want to use it to the same degree therefore we
> don't have a right to use crypto?
>
> Serious boo-boo.
>
> I hope it ain't gone to print yet...
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> | |
> | _____ The Armadillo Group |
> | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
> | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http:// www.ssz.com/ |
> | .', |||| `/( e\ |
> | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
> | ravage@ssz.com |
> | 512-451-7087 |
> |____________________________________________________________________|
>
>
Return to June 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”