1997-06-04 - Re: Rotenberg or Berman? (was Re: e$: Beltway piglets and otherbarnyard animals)

Header Data

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
To: tien@well.com>
Message Hash: 894beab681ff7e8c096bc1435589416c5a725c88de523c87c286422dabf69cce
Message ID: <v0302093dafb9de96af04@[139.167.130.247]>
Reply To: <v03007805afb8066bc310@[163.176.132.90]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-04 15:06:18 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 23:06:18 +0800

Raw message

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 23:06:18 +0800
To: tien@well.com>
Subject: Re: Rotenberg or Berman?  (was  Re: e$: Beltway piglets and otherbarnyard animals)
In-Reply-To: <v03007805afb8066bc310@[163.176.132.90]>
Message-ID: <v0302093dafb9de96af04@[139.167.130.247]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 8:54 am -0400 on 6/3/97, Declan McCullagh wrote:


> This is a crucial point. Rotenberg != Berman.

To quote that great Tory, the late Francis Uquhart: "You may say that. I
couldn't *possibly* comment."

;-).

Of course dear old FU usually used that phrase in false denial. I have no
such intention here...

Cheers,
Bob

-----------------
Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com), Philodox
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/







Thread