1997-07-07 - Re: Hack the Mars rover

Header Data

From: “Paul H. Merrill” <paulmerrill@acm.org>
To: Ryan Anderson <randerso@ece.eng.wayne.edu>
Message Hash: 823fb1a764ee983a723ba8bcd427a7adcc1b404ef4493ae3b9b591b3d29f35bc
Message ID: <33C13960.7AAF@acm.org>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970706063925.4547A-100000@ece>
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-07 16:00:19 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 00:00:19 +0800

Raw message

From: "Paul H. Merrill" <paulmerrill@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 00:00:19 +0800
To: Ryan Anderson <randerso@ece.eng.wayne.edu>
Subject: Re: Hack the Mars rover
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970706063925.4547A-100000@ece>
Message-ID: <33C13960.7AAF@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Ryan Anderson wrote:
> Besides, how much encryption is needed between two points if intercepting
> the traffic is expensive, the communications protocol is undocumented (as
> far as anyone outside NASA is concerned), and the actual frequency is also
> hard to find?
>
The appropriate question is how much encryption (and other security) is
needed if interrupting the traffic causes the loss of a great deal of
money and difficult (if possible at all) fixes.  This is the mindset of
the Fed security wienies when specifying and designing; thus it must be
the mindset of the non-Fed Wienie looking to crack.

 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Paul H. Merrill                Merlyn Enterprises
paulmerrill@acm.org
I have no opinions (just facts)
    so it doesn't matter what my employer thinks.






Thread