cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-08-02 - Re: Yet another self-labeling system (do you remember -L18?)

Header Data

From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
To: James Love <love@cptech.org>
Message Hash: 6b9ef85cb8db243f0cd99a620691bfea8e9ea2b516d433d647a4b782e0a518be
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970731181540.426C-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: <33DF81CF.1662D004@cptech.org>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-02 14:08:10 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 22:08:10 +0800

Raw message

From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 22:08:10 +0800
To: James Love <love@cptech.org>
Subject: Re: Yet another self-labeling system (do you remember -L18?)
In-Reply-To: <33DF81CF.1662D004@cptech.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970731181540.426C-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain





> > Persuation is not the point, it is not necessary to persuade people
> > that
> > censorship is morally wrong in order for it to be so.
> 
>      Well, if persuasion is "not necessary," then why do you care about
> anyone's views on this?

I don`t give a fuck about anyone elses views, however, I debate such 
points here and elsewhere for my own personal pleasure, the real power to 
change things comes through the use of technology, not debate.

>     On your other point, I really don't agree that is morally wrong to
> take steps to prevent children from having access to pornography. 
> People may propose ways of doing this which are objectionable, but the
> basic goal is hardly immoral.  Indeed, many think it is immoral not to
> protect children.

Foo. I see no point in pursuing this any further.


        Datacomms Technologies data security
       Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
  Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org    
       Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
      Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
     "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"

Thread