1997-08-02 - Re: Yet another self-labeling system (do you remember -L18?)

Header Data

From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Message Hash: b4deec232c80f41d6b9f64561e195680da073f342bfea111bc3c930a620a5e7d
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970731175000.426A-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970730115813.3330F-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-02 14:21:21 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 22:21:21 +0800

Raw message

From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 22:21:21 +0800
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: Re: Yet another self-labeling system (do you remember -L18?)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970730115813.3330F-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970731175000.426A-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




> It generally is not morally wrong to take steps to prevent children from
> having access to pornography, provided they're your children or you have a
> custodial relationship. 

I used to be of broadly this opinion, and still am conviced it is so, 
However, I think we have to separate saying something is not morally 
wrong from encouraging it, I believe parents may censor their childrens 
access to information as they see fit, but I don`t think they should.

        Datacomms Technologies data security
       Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
  Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org    
       Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
      Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
     "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"






Thread