From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Message Hash: b4deec232c80f41d6b9f64561e195680da073f342bfea111bc3c930a620a5e7d
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970731175000.426A-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970730115813.3330F-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-02 14:21:21 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 22:21:21 +0800
From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 22:21:21 +0800
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: Re: Yet another self-labeling system (do you remember -L18?)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970730115813.3330F-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970731175000.426A-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> It generally is not morally wrong to take steps to prevent children from
> having access to pornography, provided they're your children or you have a
> custodial relationship.
I used to be of broadly this opinion, and still am conviced it is so,
However, I think we have to separate saying something is not morally
wrong from encouraging it, I believe parents may censor their childrens
access to information as they see fit, but I don`t think they should.
Datacomms Technologies data security
Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org
Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
"Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"
Return to August 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”