From: Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
To: Mike Jones <Mkljones@cris.com>
Message Hash: c9f00705e17582ae02af4ce563543a3449d74a4981c69bf45c22064bf6a03490
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970814113451.21579G-100000@beast.brainlink.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970813213346.8665A-100000@mariner.cris.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-14 15:50:54 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 23:50:54 +0800
From: Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 23:50:54 +0800
To: Mike Jones <Mkljones@cris.com>
Subject: Re: Hypothetical situation for networks
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970813213346.8665A-100000@mariner.cris.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970814113451.21579G-100000@beast.brainlink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, Mike Jones wrote:
> Would make sense for them to use a type of NFS system, but is there an
> implimentation of secure (ie: encrypted) NFS available?
>
> OS doesn't really matter, as it is a hypothetical system, but we'll assume
> either some form of unix/linux, or perhaps winNT or novell NetWare.
Can NFS under solaris or linux be tunneled through SSH? That would seem
feasable (that is if you can get SSH to tunnel a UDP...) If not, you
could use microsoft's PPTP, but I wouldn't trust its cyphers.
=====================================Kaos=Keraunos=Kybernetos==============
.+.^.+.| Ray Arachelian |Prying open my 3rd eye. So good to see |./|\.
..\|/..|sunder@sundernet.com|you once again. I thought you were |/\|/\
<--*-->| ------------------ |hiding, and you thought that I had run |\/|\/
../|\..| "A toast to Odin, |away chasing the tail of dogma. I opened|.\|/.
.+.v.+.|God of screwdrivers"|my eye and there we were.... |.....
======================= http://www.sundernet.com ==========================
Return to August 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”