From: harka@nycmetro.com
To: CYPHERPUNKS@ssz.com
Message Hash: 035136928aa956d6ba5bbe0a2c4964d09f818aec157abfdc861e44517ac3ca94
Message ID: <199710252037.PAA30248@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-25 20:14:34 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 04:14:34 +0800
From: harka@nycmetro.com
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 04:14:34 +0800
To: CYPHERPUNKS@ssz.com
Subject: Re: poverty traps (Re: Sa
Message-ID: <199710252037.PAA30248@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Harka <harka@nycmetro.com> wrote:
> That may indeed work for some people, but the argument of
> "self-discipline and sacrifice" usually goes overboard once
> people _other than yourself_ are severely affected by that.
> "Sorry hun, you can't have a new winter-coat. Mommy has to save
> enough money so that she can choose the people she works for.
> And no...no christmas this year either".
-=> Quoting In:aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk to Harka <=-
In> That is indeed a sad financial state to be in. I have trouble
In> believing it though.
[examples of well-fares deleted]
In> So if any kids are being deprived of winter clothes or
In> whatever, it's not because their parents don't have enough
In> money, it's because their parents are stupid, or selfish.
Although my statement was deliberately somewhat exaggerated, it is
not that far from reality for quite a few people I know.
A real-life example:
A single (divorced) mother, 4 kids (3-12 years), working full-time
and making in theory $42 000/year. After taxes that comes down to
$2000 cash per month.
In order for her to be able to work her two youngest kids go to a
day-care-center. Wham! $1000 per month (hiring a baby-sitter would
amount to even more).
Her apartment costs $800/month excluding utilities. That leaves
$200 (+ $800 she gets in child-support) per month for _five_ people
to live on (clothes, food, utilities, school-books, gas for the
car, etc.etc.)
One thousand dollars per month for five people!! And that in New
York City!
She is not entitled to any support such as free school-meals for
the kids etc., because she "makes too much money" (_before_ taxes,
of course!)
What efforts has she made to make "herself more marketable"? She has
been working ever since the age of 16, went 8 years to College (paid
by herself and paying rent at the same time) and now has a Masters
Degree in teaching.
What has it brought her? Bill-collectors calling every day!
She made a calculation and (confirming your statement) came to the
conclusion, that she indeed would have _more_ money by not working
at all and simply going on welfare.
However, that is not a choice she wants to make.
Is she to be called "stupid" and "selfish" because she's poor
despite her efforts???
I don't think so. She, btw., is not the only person I know
struggeling in this manner from one month into the next, barely
being able to even catch up on bills.
Neither does she have a free choice of employers. There is only one
board of education in the City. Changing for a private school would
come with (at least a temporary) pay-cut, that she obviously can't
afford.
Therefore:
Since she isn't the only person I can think of, who is in such a
position, the argument formerly known as "If 'ya don't like the
company-policy [employing GAK/CAK] just leave and work for
somebody else" may now be called: "Ad Acta".
Ciao
Harka
/*************************************************************/
/* E-mail: harka(at)nycmetro.com (PGP-encrypted mail pref'd) */
/* PGP public key available upon request. [KeyID: 04174301] */
/* F-print: FD E4 F8 6D C1 6A 44 F5 28 9C 40 6E B8 94 78 E8 */
/*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*/
/* May there be peace in this world, may all anger dissolve */
/* and may all living beings find the way to happiness... */
/*************************************************************/
... Don't you hate it when the pessimists are right all the time?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAgUBNFJRbDltEBIEF0MBAQFAGgf+PoTI/+900uSojxfC/xKFPsEnco5fp+df
Etn4uJ23l9ZB7QczEuP96JMo+5vmFXc9Tabh5nMkNCRrA3QaAwxFh2+Boc8RvzAv
SBLbjeqnCkvca1EgfOO+eZKv/YcRAZ47JH/w6/g/ggSx3vyM9quFeOqGzljG21au
JdjFhtcdvWP2R79ldGnjswjjuT8MntSGwfx+wiKVQtt6YcK81/OKCBFMaZ8o7JTr
gzYRzv6y+622Z97rUItmdEwQtDqq8k9wtRfmV1xPloqAHJ65VcJ3HI1LoItTmase
oEWPiy6NBIeyN+Nbn+aK/egOalOHev8nX/LqTPxN3TawmxnESldEsg==
=u2Q5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
If encryption is outlawed, only outlaws will have encryption...
Return to October 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”