1997-10-01 - Re: Secure HTTP servers.

Header Data

From: lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 13a2376a263c3c4590a18e51d617c678aa501a7d6d343fd49794b1c09eae7323
Message ID: <slrn634tsa.23j.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
Reply To: <LaBwDe3w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-01 16:37:09 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 00:37:09 +0800

Raw message

From: lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 00:37:09 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Secure HTTP servers.
In-Reply-To: <LaBwDe3w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <slrn634tsa.23j.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



* Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
>Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de> writes:
>> Secure HTTP ist the HTTP protocol based on SSL sockets. You may choose any
>> server you like or which fits your needs (database connections, ...). There
>> are not so many cryptographic failtures a developer can do. Keep you hands
>> away from servers only supporting exportable protocols.

>Are the posters in this thread unwilling to criticize C2Net's StrongHold
>because they're afraid to get obnoxious threatening letters from Sameer
>Parekh's shysters?

Why should we deal with Stronghold while other alteratives work fine?






Thread