1997-10-01 - Re: Secure HTTP servers.

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b16ff39a6c6476150e9fa89d864d00ea4f3bc63b378cc6de5d74ca3bbde183bf
Message ID: <ksowDe3w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <slrn634tsa.23j.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-01 20:51:10 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 04:51:10 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 04:51:10 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Secure HTTP servers.
In-Reply-To: <slrn634tsa.23j.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
Message-ID: <ksowDe3w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) writes:

> 
> * Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> >Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de> writes:
> >> Secure HTTP ist the HTTP protocol based on SSL sockets. You may choose any
> >> server you like or which fits your needs (database connections, ...). Ther
> >> are not so many cryptographic failtures a developer can do. Keep you hands
> >> away from servers only supporting exportable protocols.
> 
> >Are the posters in this thread unwilling to criticize C2Net's StrongHold
> >because they're afraid to get obnoxious threatening letters from Sameer
> >Parekh's shysters?
> 
> Why should we deal with Stronghold while other alteratives work fine?
> 


Good question, especially when other vendors don't seek to suppress
the discussion of theirt products.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps






Thread