From: Philip Zimmermann <prz@pgp.com>
To: Randall Farmer <rfarmer@HiWAAY.net>
Message Hash: 6fb473bf99073ce8726454d848b8d1b923f59591ebf332c4f64a554df7dc9f6c
Message ID: <v03007802b07692bd74f3@[205.180.136.41]>
Reply To: <344FEE15.673F@pgp.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-24 18:12:59 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 02:12:59 +0800
From: Philip Zimmermann <prz@pgp.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 02:12:59 +0800
To: Randall Farmer <rfarmer@HiWAAY.net>
Subject: Re: PRZ Announcement
In-Reply-To: <344FEE15.673F@pgp.com>
Message-ID: <v03007802b07692bd74f3@[205.180.136.41]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
My name is spelled Philip, not Phillip. --prz
At 8:44 PM -0500 10/23/97, Randall Farmer wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, there's no way in nine hells that Phillip R. Zimmermann
>could have wrote:
>...
>> However, I have reassessed my views of who truly has a right
>> to control access to privacy and have come to the conclusion
>> that privacy is too important an issue to be left in the hands
>> of the individual, with the obvious potential for misuse.
>
>Hmm...I haven't checked any signatures or headers yet, but something tells me
>that this ain't PRZ. For example, the Organization: header refers to Orwell's
>1984 as a "blueprint"...forget the signatures (just got a message saying they
>match -- either that person's lying, "they" cracked his key, or it's some
>detail that has the program using a different key/ignoring some text), it is
>psychologically impossible for someone to go from privacy advocate to
>1984-as-a-blueprint that quick.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Randall Farmer
> rfarmer@hiwaay.net
> http://hiwaay.net/~rfarmer
Return to October 1997
Return to “Randall Farmer <rfarmer@HiWAAY.net>”