1997-10-03 - Re: Stronghold

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a8423ea7e60ba8e1659c12a02260bccb9297eb891535f9940836c368cea0247e
Message ID: <RqRyDe2w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971002204421.3283B-100000@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-03 02:57:58 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 10:57:58 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 10:57:58 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Stronghold
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971002204421.3283B-100000@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to>
Message-ID: <RqRyDe2w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> writes:

> On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Anonymous wrote:
> > 
> > C2Net was wrong to censor the cypherpunks list in the guise of moderation.
> > It was wrong to send threatening letters to people who claimed its
> > products were weak.  The whole moderation/censorship experiment was a
> > terrible mistake.  The actions taken by C2Net were completely unjustified.
> Where do people get these bizarre ideas? C2 didn't censor the list. A guy
> who happened to work for C2 dropped some messages from one list. The
> messages still went out on the unfiltered list. Had he worked for Mc
> Donald's or the the NYC Sanitiation Department, would you blame them for
> this as well? 

Lucky is lying: the censored articles were also filtered from the list which
was billed as being unfiltered.


Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps