cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-11-18 - Re: Reputed child molester Joichi Ito exporting kiddie porn from Japan

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 222d38f44662cabd390960357554e630ad59c3da86f181cad5566854a2858831
Message ID: <yHgcge15w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199711171623.QAA01215@server.test.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-18 03:54:25 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 11:54:25 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 11:54:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Reputed child molester Joichi Ito exporting kiddie porn from Japan
In-Reply-To: <199711171623.QAA01215@server.test.net>
Message-ID: <yHgcge15w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk> writes:
>
> Joichi Ito <jito@eccosys.com> writes:
> > At 16:30 97/11/16 -0700, Tim May wrote:
> > > This discussion is hardly going down in flames. You're apparently too
> > > sensitive to engage in robust debate.
> >
> > This is true. I am not going engage in what you probably call a robust
> > debate. A lot of people read this list and any robust debate will
> > probably lower my reputation capital in some important area for me
> > no matter what the outcome. I am not currently willing to take this risk.
>
> I am not sure why discussion should lower your reputation capital,
> unless open discussion is frowned upon by those who you wish to
> influence.  Perhaps you fear that you will be dismissed as a
> cypherpunk, a hardliner, whilst you are trying to appear less radical.

Because Ito-san is a lying sack of shit. "I support crypto, although
not for the four horsemen." "My country will export pornography involving
underage schoolgirls, but not the RSA chip." "Politically incorrect racists
must be silenced". Fuck you, Ito-sun. Go suck a sashimi.

Thread