From: Patrick May <pjm@spe.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 1ff2ce56157c24bca733d873e30a032fe99898d1bc84b1350925ddd51a9047d1
Message ID: <1661-Mon29Dec1997034752-0800-Patrick May <pjm@spe.com>
Reply To: <v0310280db0c2f8195048@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-29 11:59:03 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 19:59:03 +0800
From: Patrick May <pjm@spe.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 19:59:03 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Why I Support Microsoft
In-Reply-To: <v0310280db0c2f8195048@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <1661-Mon29Dec1997034752-0800-Patrick May <pjm@spe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Tim May writes:
> At 1:53 PM -0700 12/27/97, Patrick May wrote:
> >The President should issue an executive order mandating that all
> >government agencies immediately remove all Microsoft operating systems
> >from their machines, to be replaced with Linux. All Microsoft
> >products should be eliminated as well. The standard text format
> >should be LaTeX. All businesses receiving money from government
> >contracts should be required to use the same tools.
[ . . . ]
>
> Much to be said for this "free market solution." Certainly the Justice
> Department has no business screaming "monopoly!" if it's still
> "standardizing" on MS products.
[ . . . ]
> On the other hand, requiring _any_ language, program, or OS is probably a
> mistake. If the Arctic Cartography Office wants to keep using its Macs, why
> should some bureaucrat force them to scrap their Macs and use Linux?
>
> (Yeah, yeah, a form of Linux, MK-Linux, runs on Macs. But Adobe Photoshop
> doesn't run under Linux. And Mathematica doesn't run under Linux for the
> Mac (last I checked). And so on. The point is, why standardize at the end
> of a gun?)
Okay, so I'm a UNIX-head; I forgot about the Macs (a dangerous
thing to do, given the ferocity of their supporters). If the
government were to adopt my suggestion, two major results would be:
- The third party market for Linux software would grow rapidly
and enormously.
- The government's software budget would be reduced dramatically.
I consider both of these to be Good Things (tm). The government
wouldn't be forcing anything at the point of a gun, they'd simply be
making a financially responsible vendor selection (hey, there's a
first time for everything). Our tax dollars shouldn't be wasted on
substandard software when superior, cheaper alternatives exist.
Regards,
Patrick May
S P Engineering, Inc.
Return to December 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”