1998-09-10 - Re: radio net (fwd)

Header Data

From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 26d080a8a55e872c108950a5121a24058d30799cbc7f5d5e7c7d0b38365ae0af
Message ID: <35F903D8.3E787140@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
Reply To: <33CCFE438B9DD01192E800A024C84A19284623@mossbay.chaffeyhomes.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-10 22:04:52 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 06:04:52 +0800

Raw message

From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 06:04:52 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: radio net (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <33CCFE438B9DD01192E800A024C84A19284623@mossbay.chaffeyhomes.com>
Message-ID: <35F903D8.3E787140@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Bill Stewart wrote:
> 
> Not per se, though there _is_ still one major restriction -
> the Defense Department gets a crack at patent applications,
> so if you try to patent a crypto algorithm or crypto phone,
> they can seize and classify your patent application and
> working materials, using the excuse of "national security".
> There was a case in the late 70s where somebody tried to patent
> a wimpy analog scrambler for CB radios, and got it seized,
> and a number of patent applications that got delayed a long time.

It seems then to be advisable to apply for international patents
simultaneously. One can e.g. apply for a European patent that is 
valid for a number of countries.

M. K. Shen





Thread