From: David Honig <honig@sprynet.com>
To: Steve Bryan <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 343d08240c96b52b0395159f793ef80176536034e39cf00617f1969519b9c257
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19981007161433.008989e0@m7.sprynet.com>
Reply To: <3.0.5.32.19981007090445.008903c0@m7.sprynet.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-08 17:17:15 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 01:17:15 +0800
From: David Honig <honig@sprynet.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 01:17:15 +0800
To: Steve Bryan <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Web TV with 128b exported
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19981007090445.008903c0@m7.sprynet.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19981007161433.008989e0@m7.sprynet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 02:39 PM 10/7/98 -0500, Steve Bryan wrote:
>David Honig wrote:
>
>>I'd guess that the Export control puppets know that the Web-TV hubs will
>>be subpoena-able by the US even in these other "sovereign" nations.
>>The WebTV centralized infrastructure makes this easy.
>
>This announcement seems to be getting a lot of this sort of reaction but I
>don't see quite why the news is greeted with such animosity. If a duly
>authorized search warrant is required in order to obtain information that
>represents a potential world of difference from having unrestricted ability
>to monitor all communications.
>
>Steve Bryan
The announcement would be a lot better if foreigners were "permitted"
strong disk
encryption; or if foreigners were "permitted" the high grade anonymity that
packet routing can provide.
Do you think the US would allow strong crypto WebTV for foreigners if the
foreigners had secure links to an equivalent, independent, foreign WebTV
service whose assets were not readily seized, whose techs were not easily
made into Agents, whose officers were not readily kidnappable by the USDoJ,
etc.
Just think of the cookie recipes the infidels would be circulating..
I really doubt Osama subscribes to WebTV. :-)
Return to October 1998
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”