1998-12-12 - Re: Postcard Debates

Header Data

From: Robert Wenzler <rwenzler@usachoice.com>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 1074bd4a0401d63cd21e2f4649e6383bf739cb8d06d262c05096fffe16b8da60
Message ID: <3671B447.16498817@usachoice.com>
Reply To: <199812111341.IAA15146@mailfw1.ford.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-12 00:57:26 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 08:57:26 +0800

Raw message

From: Robert Wenzler <rwenzler@usachoice.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 08:57:26 +0800
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Postcard Debates
In-Reply-To: <199812111341.IAA15146@mailfw1.ford.com>
Message-ID: <3671B447.16498817@usachoice.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain





"Wilson, Jamie (J.R.)" wrote:
> 
> If everyone just encrypted their messages then no suspicions would be raised
> regarding the use of encryption.  Most people use envelopes, plain and
> simple -- and as a result no one questions what they are hiding.  It's
> understood that mail is private and therefore people have a right to seal it
> in an envelope and not worry about people tampering with it.  On the same
> note, there are federal regulations and penalties (in the U.S. anyway) for
> tampering with mail and interrupting the delivery of it.  The same laws
> should apply to email.

Right. If everyone used encryption, there would not as much public
debate about it.

For now, it is not commonly used and viewed as secrative.

Now for a general question to all that may read this: How much are
you willing to do something to change the laws?
However much people are willing to stick up for this issue is the
amount things could change.





Thread