From: Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil>
To: “cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 443a32775f9e9fcb99b2289cb37fa93977f75f0f43475793cf3a622068a18500
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19981212115057.00a85560@205.83.192.13>
Reply To: <199812111341.IAA15146@mailfw1.ford.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-12 04:01:01 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 12:01:01 +0800
From: Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 12:01:01 +0800
To: "cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RE: Postcard Debates
In-Reply-To: <199812111341.IAA15146@mailfw1.ford.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19981212115057.00a85560@205.83.192.13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
This would open the door for the USPS to charge for each email sent.
The same rules? No. Based on those rules, but not the same rules.
The same rules would slow email down considerably also, wouldn't they???<g>
Reeza!
At 08:41 AM 12/11/98 -0500, Wilson, Jamie (J.R.) wrote:
>If everyone just encrypted their messages then no suspicions would be raised
>regarding the use of encryption. Most people use envelopes, plain and
>simple -- and as a result no one questions what they are hiding. It's
>understood that mail is private and therefore people have a right to seal it
>in an envelope and not worry about people tampering with it. On the same
>note, there are federal regulations and penalties (in the U.S. anyway) for
>tampering with mail and interrupting the delivery of it. The same laws
>should apply to email.
>
>____________________________________________________
>Jamie R. Wilson
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Wenzler [mailto:rwenzler@usachoice.com]
>Sent: Thursday, 10 December, 1998 13:56
>To: Mbishop645@aol.com
>Cc: maven@weirdness.com; hab@gamegirlz.com; Cypherpunks@toad.com
>Subject: Re:
>
>
>
>
>Mbishop645@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> >HaB wrote:
>> ><snip>
>> >> That's a good place to begin, though. "Would you send a letter to
>> >> someone without an envelope?" "Then why not put your email in the
>> >> electronic equivalent of one?"
>> >>
>> >> balance.
>> >
>> >Would I send a letter to someone without an envelope?
>> >One word: postcard.
>>
>> Ahh, but would you tape a check for your phone bill to a postcard? Other
>> than writing a greeting to someone what else do you use a postcard for?
>
>No, I would not tape a phone bill check to a postcard. There is the
>chance for it to fall off.
>
>There is different methods of sending mail for different levels of
>security and functionality. Some people make it obvious what is inside
>an envelope. (who would not recognize a Christmas card from the
>envelope?) Others make it as bland and normal as possible to
>have it go by without much notice.
>
>It all depends on how secure you want it. Some things you can do
>with what amounts to postcard security.
>
>What amount of security do you want for your email? Would you be
>willing to do something extra for that security?
>
>This type of question is up to each person. How much risk is the
>person willing to take. Each person has the responsibility to
>understand what the risks are and to decide what risks they are
>willing to take.
>
>
>
Return to December 1998
Return to ““Wilson, Jamie (J.R.)” <jwilso37@visteonet.com>”