Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net> (27 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: Pasting in From:

• 1997-12-02 (Wed, 3 Dec 1997 01:13:22 +0800) - Re: Pasting in From: - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>
  • 1997-12-02 (Wed, 3 Dec 1997 01:27:18 +0800) - Re: Pasting in From: - Andy Dustman <andy@neptune.chem.uga.edu>

Re: Pasting in From:

• 1997-12-02 (Wed, 3 Dec 1997 04:28:38 +0800) - Re: Pasting in From: - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>
  • 1997-12-02 (Wed, 3 Dec 1997 07:59:41 +0800) - Re: Pasting in From: - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>

Re: Pasting in From:

• 1997-12-02 (Wed, 3 Dec 1997 07:21:23 +0800) - Re: Pasting in From: - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: [RePol] Bill Stewart kills babies after he molests them. Honest! / Re: Pasting in From:

• 1997-12-03 (Wed, 3 Dec 1997 22:29:36 +0800) - Re: [RePol] Bill Stewart kills babies after he molests them. Honest! / Re: Pasting in From: - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>
  • 1997-12-03 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 06:03:07 +0800) - Re: [RePol] Re: Pasting in From: you@yourmachine.com - stewarts@ix.netcom.com

Re: Bill Stewart kills babies after he molests them. Honest! /

• 1997-12-03 (Wed, 3 Dec 1997 22:30:27 +0800) - Re: Bill Stewart kills babies after he molests them. Honest! / - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: *** PGP HAS A BACKDOOR - by Phil Zimmerman

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-03 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 07:06:42 +0800) - Re: *** PGP HAS A BACKDOOR - by Phil Zimmerman - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: [RePol] Bill Stewart kills babies after he molests them. Honest! / Re: Pasting in From:

• 1997-12-04 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 06:41:49 +0800) - Re: [RePol] Bill Stewart kills babies after he molests them. Honest! / Re: Pasting in From: - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: Anonymous Thread

• 1997-12-06 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 12:08:46 +0800) - Re: Anonymous Thread - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: Remailer Trivia / Re: Singapore & Freedom

• 1997-12-08 (Tue, 9 Dec 1997 01:51:34 +0800) - Re: Remailer Trivia / Re: Singapore & Freedom - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: Complete package for Cantsin Protocol No. 2

• 1997-12-08 (Tue, 9 Dec 1997 02:08:02 +0800) - Re: Complete package for Cantsin Protocol No. 2 - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>
  • 1997-12-09 (Wed, 10 Dec 1997 02:38:48 +0800) - Re: Complete package for Cantsin Protocol No. 2 - Steffen Zahn <zahn@berlin.snafu.de>

Re: Remailer Trivia / Re: Singapore & Freedom

• 1997-12-09 (Tue, 9 Dec 1997 23:16:05 +0800) - Re: Remailer Trivia / Re: Singapore & Freedom - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: Remailer Trivia / Re: Singapore & Freedom (fwd)

• 1997-12-09 (Wed, 10 Dec 1997 07:32:56 +0800) - Re: Remailer Trivia / Re: Singapore & Freedom (fwd) - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-16 (Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:48:45 +0800) - Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-16 (Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:50:28 +0800) - Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-18 (Fri, 19 Dec 1997 06:32:37 +0800) - Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva)

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-19 (Sat, 20 Dec 1997 06:13:41 +0800) - Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva) - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva)

• 1997-12-20 (Sun, 21 Dec 1997 02:26:45 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva) - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>
  • 1997-12-20 (Sun, 21 Dec 1997 02:55:07 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-12-22 (Mon, 22 Dec 1997 11:15:44 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? - ichudov@Algebra.COM (Igor Chudov @ home)
  • 1997-12-20 (Sun, 21 Dec 1997 04:12:23 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? - “Robert A. Costner” <pooh@efga.org>
  • 1997-12-20 (Sun, 21 Dec 1997 05:29:20 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva) - Dave Emery <die@die.com>
    • 1997-12-21 (Sun, 21 Dec 1997 13:51:25 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva) - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
      • 1997-12-21 (Sun, 21 Dec 1997 23:31:07 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Pet - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
      • 1997-12-21 (Mon, 22 Dec 1997 07:30:57 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva) - Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>
        • 1997-12-22 (Tue, 23 Dec 1997 03:48:31 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
          • 1997-12-23 (Tue, 23 Dec 1997 23:09:18 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva) - Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
        • 1997-12-24 (Wed, 24 Dec 1997 11:52:14 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? - “bill.stewart@pobox.com” <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
      • 1997-12-24 (Wed, 24 Dec 1997 11:51:47 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva) - “bill.stewart@pobox.com” <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
    • 1997-12-21 (Sun, 21 Dec 1997 15:36:42 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva) - Joichi Ito <jito@eccosys.com>
      • 1997-12-21 (Sun, 21 Dec 1997 17:15:36 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
      • 1997-12-21 (Sun, 21 Dec 1997 19:15:32 +0800) - Re: Is Anonymous Communication only for “Criminals”? (was: Re: UCENET II and Peter duh Silva) - Joichi Ito <jito@eccosys.com>
  • 1997-12-21 (Mon, 22 Dec 1997 04:46:56 +0800) - Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals” - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>
  • 1997-12-23 (Tue, 23 Dec 1997 18:32:34 +0800) - Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals” - The Sheriff <sheriff@speakeasy.org>

Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals”

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-20 (Sun, 21 Dec 1997 04:32:13 +0800) - Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals” - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals”

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-21 (Mon, 22 Dec 1997 02:09:30 +0800) - Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals” - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals”

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-22 (Mon, 22 Dec 1997 23:32:45 +0800) - Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals” - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals”

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-22 (Tue, 23 Dec 1997 02:31:07 +0800) - Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals” - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: Remailer Logs (and Accountability)

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-22 (Tue, 23 Dec 1997 03:21:48 +0800) - Re: Remailer Logs (and Accountability) - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals”

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-23 (Tue, 23 Dec 1997 10:12:16 +0800) - Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals” - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: Accountability and Traceless Remailers

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-23 (Tue, 23 Dec 1997 23:47:37 +0800) - Re: Accountability and Traceless Remailers - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals”

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-24 (Thu, 25 Dec 1997 02:27:52 +0800) - Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for “Criminals” - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>

Re: Remailer Logs (and Accountability)

• Unknown thread root
  • 1998-01-03 (Sat, 3 Jan 1998 13:09:08 +0800) - Re: Remailer Logs (and Accountability) - Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net>
    • 1998-01-04 (Sun, 4 Jan 1998 11:10:50 +0800) - Re: [RePol] Re: Remailer Logs (and Accountability) - Andy Dustman <andy@neptune.chem.uga.edu>