Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM> (8 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Key Expiration (was: Revoking Old Lost Keys)

• 1996-01-08 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 01:36:19 +0800) - Key Expiration (was: Revoking Old Lost Keys) - olbon@dynetics.com (Clay Olbon II)
  • 1996-01-08 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 04:05:23 +0800) - Cool story. - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>

[Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]

• 1996-01-08 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 01:51:10 +0800) - [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - Shri <skc@huge.net.hk>
  • 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 08:14:47 +0800) - Re: [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - greeeeaaaaat* <root@bushing.plastic.crosslink.net>
    • 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 09:01:15 +0800) - Re: [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  • 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 09:00:53 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 10:04:37 +0800) - Still [NOISE] but a.f.urban was clearly wrong [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      • 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 01:37:35 +0800) - Re: Still [NOISE] but a.f.urban was clearly wrong [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        • 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 96 12:28:25 PST) - Re: Still [NOISE] but a.f.urban was clearly wrong [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]) - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>
      • 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 13:59:53 +0800) - Re: Still [NOISE] but a.f.urban was clearly wrong [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support]) - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>
    • 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 03:07:15 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] [Fwd: Re: ABOI: Desperate User Support] - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>

Re: Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security bugs (a bit long, with references)

• 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 1996 16:18:40 +0800) - Re: Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security bugs (a bit long, with references) - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
  • 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 04:15:24 +0800) - Re: Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security bugs (a bit long, with references) - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>

Re: Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows securitybugs (a bit long, with references)

• 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 02:34:32 +0800) - Re: Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows securitybugs (a bit long, with references) - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
  • 1996-01-09 (Tue, 9 Jan 96 12:30:01 PST) - Re: Microsoft continues to mislead public about Windows security bugs (a bit long, with references) - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>

Don’t type: “g*d tms vr*s”

• 1996-01-09 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 03:56:12 +0800) - Don’t type: “g*d tms vr*s” - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 00:16:26 +0800) - Re: Don’t type: “g*d tms vr*s” - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>
  • 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 08:56:34 PST) - Re: Don’t type: “g*d tms vr*s” - abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
    • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 04:40:03 +0800) - Re: Don’t type: “g*d tms vr*s” - sameer <sameer@c2.org>

When they came for the Jews…

• 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 1996 23:53:08 +0800) - When they came for the Jews… - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
  • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 00:54:29 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
    • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 01:44:40 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
    • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 02:34:55 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
      • 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 11:09:30 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Kevin L Prigge <Kevin.L.Prigge-2@cis.umn.edu>
      • 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 11:33:20 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
      • 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 11:49:54 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
      • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 06:04:42 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
        • 1996-01-11 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 17:13:47 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - attila <attila@primenet.com>
        • 1996-01-11 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 19:18:16 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
  • 1996-01-10 (Wed, 10 Jan 96 09:13:34 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Kent Dahlgren <kent@trouble.WV.TEK.COM>
  • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 01:56:40 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
    • 1996-01-10 (Thu, 11 Jan 1996 04:41:44 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - grimm@MIT.EDU
  • 1996-01-11 (Thu, 11 Jan 96 11:11:10 PST) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
    • 1996-01-12 (Fri, 12 Jan 1996 16:58:00 +0800) - [Sarin?] Re: When they came for the Jews… - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  • 1996-01-11 (Fri, 12 Jan 1996 06:01:18 +0800) - Re: When they came for the Jews… - Bryce <wilcoxb@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>