Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org> (11 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison”

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-05-01 (Thu, 1 May 1997 22:21:48 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison” - Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org>
    • 1997-05-01 (Fri, 2 May 1997 01:07:03 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison” - sameer <sameer@c2.net>
    • 1997-05-01 (Fri, 2 May 1997 02:47:11 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison” - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-05-01 (Fri, 2 May 1997 02:42:00 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison” - sameer <sameer@c2.net>
      • 1997-05-01 (Fri, 2 May 1997 02:48:44 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison” - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
        • 1997-05-01 (Fri, 2 May 1997 04:08:00 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison” - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
          • 1997-05-01 (Fri, 2 May 1997 04:16:57 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison” - sameer <sameer@c2.net>
            • 1997-05-01 (Fri, 2 May 1997 04:48:09 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison” - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
              • 1997-05-01 (Fri, 2 May 1997 04:46:03 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison” - sameer <sameer@c2.net>
              • 1997-05-01 (Fri, 2 May 1997 06:22:16 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison” - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
        • 1997-05-01 (Fri, 2 May 1997 04:17:31 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison” - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-05-01 (Fri, 2 May 1997 06:05:39 +0800) - recypherdomicilization? - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
      • 1997-05-01 (Fri, 2 May 1997 07:22:38 +0800) - Crypto hooks and EAR (Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison”) - das@razor.engr.sgi.com (Anil Das)
    • 1997-05-01 (Fri, 2 May 1997 07:27:41 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison” - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>

Re: SAFE Bill discussion

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 09:25:34 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - “Shabbir J. Safdar” <shabbir@vtw.org>
    • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 18:17:29 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 21:10:52 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
      • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 23:42:07 +0800) - TWO Letters on SAFE - Marc Rotenberg <rotenberg@epic.org>
        • 1997-05-02 (Sat, 3 May 1997 00:15:07 +0800) - Re: TWO Letters on SAFE - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
          • 1997-05-04 (Sun, 4 May 1997 10:34:43 +0800) - Re: TWO Letters on SAFE - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
        • 1997-05-02 (Sat, 3 May 1997 00:16:29 +0800) - Re: TWO Letters on SAFE - “Shabbir J. Safdar” <shabbir@vtw.org>
    • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 22:04:11 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - “Shabbir J. Safdar” <shabbir@vtw.org>
      • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 22:20:42 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - Mac Norton <mnorton@cavern.uark.edu>
      • 1997-05-02 (Sat, 3 May 1997 04:16:13 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
    • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 22:06:04 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - “Shabbir J. Safdar” <shabbir@vtw.org>
      • 1997-05-02 (Sat, 3 May 1997 00:21:27 +0800) - Re: TWO Letters on SAFE - “Shabbir J. Safdar” <shabbir@vtw.org>
      • 1997-05-02 (Sat, 3 May 1997 00:21:45 +0800) - Re: TWO Letters on SAFE - Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org>
    • 1997-05-03 (Sat, 3 May 1997 15:37:26 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>

High Ranking Reprsentative pulls support of SAFE…

• 1997-05-02 (Sat, 3 May 1997 01:31:35 +0800) - High Ranking Reprsentative pulls support of SAFE… - Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org>
  • 1997-05-02 (Sat, 3 May 1997 03:44:24 +0800) - Re: High Ranking Reprsentative pulls support of SAFE… - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>

CDT Policy Post 3.13 - New FBI Crypto Bill To Force Key Recovery

• 1997-09-08 (Tue, 9 Sep 1997 00:17:25 +0800) - CDT Policy Post 3.13 - New FBI Crypto Bill To Force Key Recovery - Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org>

Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than nobill

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-09-09 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 07:56:16 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than nobill - Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org>
    • 1997-09-10 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 10:02:10 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than nobill - Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org>
      • 1997-09-10 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 11:19:18 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
        • 1997-09-10 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 13:47:53 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
        • 1997-09-10 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 14:19:56 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - “Brock N. Meeks” <brock@well.com>
          • 1997-09-10 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 17:32:19 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
          • 1997-09-10 (Thu, 11 Sep 1997 02:19:00 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than nobill - Marshall Clow <mclow@owl.csusm.edu>
        • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 06:31:33 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
          • 1997-09-13 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 12:23:39 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - “Brock N. Meeks” <brock@well.com>
          • 1997-09-13 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 13:03:31 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than nobill - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
          • 1997-09-13 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 13:07:21 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
          • 1997-09-16 (Tue, 16 Sep 1997 08:53:53 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - amp@pobox.com
      • 1997-09-10 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 11:47:57 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than nobill - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
        • 1997-09-10 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 11:59:05 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
          • 1997-09-10 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 14:01:12 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
          • 1997-09-10 (Thu, 11 Sep 1997 07:06:06 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
            • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 20:13:24 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@upaya.multiverse.com>
        • 1997-09-10 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 18:10:37 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@upaya.multiverse.com>
      • 1997-09-10 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 23:13:15 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than nobill - Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org>

Oxley crypto update: vote in 90 minutes

• 1997-09-24 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 02:23:13 +0800) - Oxley crypto update: vote in 90 minutes - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
  • 1997-09-24 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 02:36:29 +0800) - Re: Oxley crypto update: vote in 90 minutes - Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org>
    • 1997-09-24 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 02:42:42 +0800) - Re: Oxley crypto update: vote in 90 minutes - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>

In response to Declan’s questions about crypto.com

• 1997-09-26 (Sat, 27 Sep 1997 03:29:02 +0800) - In response to Declan’s questions about crypto.com - Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org>
  • 1997-09-26 (Sat, 27 Sep 1997 06:28:19 +0800) - Re: In response to Declan’s questions about crypto.com - Jon Lebkowsky <jonl@well.com>
    • 1997-09-26 (Sat, 27 Sep 1997 07:25:26 +0800) - Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200.00 / Re: In response to Declan’s questions about crypto.com - A Player To Be Named Later <aptbnl@dev.null>
      • 1997-09-27 (Sat, 27 Sep 1997 15:12:01 +0800) - Compromising the constitution in style [was] Re: Do not pass Go. Mime-Version: 1.0 - “Attila T. Hun” <attila@hun.org>
  • 1997-09-27 (Sat, 27 Sep 1997 09:56:37 +0800) - Re: In response to Declan’s questions about crypto.com - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>

Singapore TOILET ALERT

• 1997-10-22 (Wed, 22 Oct 1997 22:27:25 +0800) - Singapore TOILET ALERT - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
  • 1997-10-22 (Wed, 22 Oct 1997 23:10:14 +0800) - puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 02:06:19 +0800) - PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 03:31:57 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 02:24:11 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org>
      • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:45:15 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 07:33:49 +0800) - Adam Back: Guardian of CP purity? (Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
      • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:40:28 +0800) - Re: Adam Back: Guardian of CP purity? (Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 00:03:22 +0800) - Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT - Harish Pillay <harish@ganymede.contact.com.sg>
  • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 00:31:37 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILETALERT) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 02:41:58 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:48:01 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
        • 1997-10-24 (Sat, 25 Oct 1997 00:18:09 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET - lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 03:05:01 +0800) - Singaporean control freaks & CMR (Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-23 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:09:44 +0800) - Re: Singaporean control freaks & CMR (Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues) - Harish Pillay <harish@ganymede.contact.com.sg>
        • 1997-10-23 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:57:55 +0800) - Re: Singaporean control freaks & CMR (Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
          • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 09:29:24 +0800) - Re: Singaporean control freaks & CMR (Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues) - Harish Pillay <harish@ganymede.contact.com.sg>
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 04:12:26 +0800) - GMR vs. GAK - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-10-23 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 09:00:09 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
      • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:35:49 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

Re: CDA: The Sequel – introduced in the U.S. Senate

• 1997-11-13 (Thu, 13 Nov 1997 10:33:19 +0800) - Re: CDA: The Sequel – introduced in the U.S. Senate - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
  • 1997-11-13 (Thu, 13 Nov 1997 12:17:06 +0800) - Re: CDA: The Sequel – introduced in the U.S. Senate - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1997-11-13 (Thu, 13 Nov 1997 21:59:53 +0800) - Re: CDA: The Sequel – introduced in the U.S. Senate - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1997-11-13 (Fri, 14 Nov 1997 05:29:19 +0800) - CDT: The Recycling / Re: CDA: The Sequel – introduced in the U.S. Senate - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
    • 1997-11-15 (Sat, 15 Nov 1997 13:09:02 +0800) - Re: CDA: The Sequel – introduced in the U.S. Senate - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
  • 1997-11-13 (Thu, 13 Nov 1997 12:47:48 +0800) - Re: CDA: The Sequel – introduced in the U.S. Senate - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
  • 1997-11-13 (Thu, 13 Nov 1997 21:34:08 +0800) - Re: CDA: The Sequel – introduced in the U.S. Senate - Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org>
    • 1997-11-13 (Fri, 14 Nov 1997 00:54:58 +0800) - Re: CDA: The Sequel – introduced in the U.S. Senate - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>