1994-03-23 - Re: CLIPPER CHIP ON LIMBAUGH

Header Data

From: rocker@hermes.acm.rpi.edu (rocker - accept no substitutes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 69445511e53e747f66b56e59d66b5a9a2ab97102a1986b65b67d3fff0657eeb7
Message ID: <199403230547.AAA23675@hermes.acm.rpi.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-23 05:47:00 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 22 Mar 94 21:47:00 PST

Raw message

From: rocker@hermes.acm.rpi.edu (rocker - accept no substitutes)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 94 21:47:00 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: CLIPPER CHIP ON LIMBAUGH
Message-ID: <199403230547.AAA23675@hermes.acm.rpi.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mar 22,  7:31pm, Bruce Fancher wrote:
} You obviously don't understand much of the "loud-mouthed ass's psychology."  
} Limbaugh is very anti-statist and if he had a position on the issue 
} there's a good change it would be anti-clipper.  Last time I checked, 
} the clipper's biggest supporters were Clinton and Gore, who aren't exactly
} Rush's favorite people.

This is what would concern me.  Limbaugh seems to be big on knee-jerk
reactions.  Has he got some intelligent insights on the Clipper issue,
or is it simply another case of "Bill's fer it so I'm agin it!"  A
well-constructed argument might convince people on both sides, crying
"Hey, it's a LIBERAL idea, it MUST be bad!" is likely to lose more
support than it gains.

           -rocker





Thread