From: Colin Orion Chandler <orion@crl.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 11:51:31 PST
To: paul braunbehrens <pbraunb@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: CLIPPER CHIP ON LIMBAUGH
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.85.9403241124.A23271-0100000@netcom2>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9403241148.A8529-0100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Just to make sure you all know, good 'ol rush can be contacted at:
70277.2502@compuserve.com
I've written him a couple letters capping on clipper, and although I 
don't know weather he really learned from what I said, but he did mention 
the next day that he 'recently learned' that the majority of the 
net-users themselves oppose clipper... just a note.

70277.2502@compuserve.com  (rush limbaugh)

On Thu, 24 Mar 1994, paul braunbehrens wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> What worries me is the people who should be on our side who might say;"hey
> If Rush is against it it must be good!"  Here's to hoping they have more 
> sense than that, but Ihave to admit that if I hear Rush come out on one 
> side of an issue I know nothing about, I look at the other side first.
> 
> BTW, is there a way to make this whole list anonymous, like having the 
> reflector strip the headers or something?  Just curious.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 23 Mar 1994, rocker - accept no substitutes wrote:
> > 
> > This is what would concern me.  Limbaugh seems to be big on knee-jerk
> > reactions.  Has he got some intelligent insights on the Clipper issue,
> > or is it simply another case of "Bill's fer it so I'm agin it!"  A
> > well-constructed argument might convince people on both sides, crying
> > "Hey, it's a LIBERAL idea, it MUST be bad!" is likely to lose more
> > support than it gains.
> > 
> >            -rocker
> > 
> 
>