cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1994-03-30 - Re: Crypto and new computing strategies

Header Data

From: Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>
To: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Message Hash: a7308f36fa445e9bd8b9867dee1465c3547990a678fef92abea0de464ee80052
Message ID: <199403302049.AA08336@zoom.bga.com>
Reply To: <9403302046.AA19970@vail.tivoli.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-30 20:50:13 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 30 Mar 94 12:50:13 PST

Raw message

From: Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 94 12:50:13 PST
To: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Subject: Re: Crypto and new computing strategies
In-Reply-To: <9403302046.AA19970@vail.tivoli.com>
Message-ID: <199403302049.AA08336@zoom.bga.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


> 
> 
> Jim choate writes:
>  > > Complexity theory doesn't have anything to do with any world, macro-
>  > > or micro- or mega- or whatever.  It's mathematics.
>  > 
>  > Complexity theory is mathematics so I would have to say your last
>  > assertion is total drivel.
> 
> I think you've misunderstood.  What I meant was that because it's a
> purely mathematical set of concepts, it doesn't have anything to do
> with hardware details.
> 
> --
> | GOOD TIME FOR MOVIE - GOING ||| Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>       |
> | TAKE TWA TO CAIRO.          ||| Tivoli Systems, Austin, TX:        |
> |     (actual fortune cookie) ||| "Like A Little Bit of Semi-Heaven" |
> 
I have to disagree, the implimentation of such a theory by a physical model
will have some hardware dependancy.

Thread