1994-07-01 - Re: Devil’s Advocate (again)

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
Message Hash: 720f2387884811cb2b5588cd6df8113ec1a57058d00aedbf10c3f8b88b84c799
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9407011344.A15239-0100000@panix.com>
Reply To: <9407011303.AA16253@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-01 17:27:48 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Jul 94 10:27:48 PDT

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 94 10:27:48 PDT
To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Subject: Re: Devil's Advocate (again)
In-Reply-To: <9407011303.AA16253@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9407011344.A15239-0100000@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Fri, 1 Jul 1994, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

> The ninth amendment, and the derived "right to privacy" ideas that
> culminated in Roe v. Wade, could also be invoked.
> .pm

Additionally, since properly executed crypto can only be breached by the 
application of torture to the key holder, The VIIIth Amendment's 
prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment may apply.


"Not to mention the IInd Amendment RKBA and in the case of the Digital 
Telephony Initiative the IIIrd Amenment's prohibition on quartering 
troops in private homes."