cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1994-11-28 - Re: A possible solution

Header Data

From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
To: Aron Freed <s009amf@discover.wright.edu>
Message Hash: 9ab635aeb94814f4117e5825c35d087a257746b42cf3b26d018e6b6a3fababe5
Message ID: <9411280252.AA02560@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.941127203235.15664A-100000@discover>
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-28 02:54:42 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 27 Nov 94 18:54:42 PST

Raw message

From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 94 18:54:42 PST
To: Aron Freed <s009amf@discover.wright.edu>
Subject: Re: A possible solution
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.941127203235.15664A-100000@discover>
Message-ID: <9411280252.AA02560@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


    Date: Sun, 27 Nov 1994 20:33:32 -0500 (EST)
    From: Aron Freed <s009amf@discover.wright.edu>

    Why don't we stick to the topic? Do you have an intelligent reply
    or are you going to shoot your mouth off? Or Maybe you can share
    something better with us, all knowing and wise one.

His reply was perfectly intelligent.  Why don't you answer his
question: Why pick on cryptography and not the other items in the
list?  Why not simply require that government respect the right of
individuals to engage in private conversation?  If someone commits a
`crime' without using cryptography is there less harm to society than
if they did use cryptography?

What is there about your proposal that might make anyone think that it
wasn't completely ridiculous?

			Rick

Thread