1994-11-28 - Re: A possible solution

Header Data

From: Aron Freed <s009amf@discover.wright.edu>
To: Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
Message Hash: f969cd206ba0b6c15e790db628361712163414e570a2f1e2ee157cad0c0a16f6
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.941127203235.15664A-100000@discover>
Reply To: <9411272126.AA05054@vail.tivoli.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-11-28 01:35:29 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 27 Nov 94 17:35:29 PST

Raw message

From: Aron Freed <s009amf@discover.wright.edu>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 94 17:35:29 PST
To: Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
Subject: Re: A possible solution
In-Reply-To: <9411272126.AA05054@vail.tivoli.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.941127203235.15664A-100000@discover>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 27 Nov 1994, Mike McNally wrote:

> So why pick specifically on cryptography?  Why not increase penalties
> for criminals who in their crimes are found to have used:
> 
> *	computers;
> *	pagers;
> *	cellular phones;
> *	Casio watches with multiple alarms;
> *	Cars with power windows;
> *	Velcro-fastening tennis shoes;
> *	Gore-Tex jackets;
> *	Ibuprofen pain relievers;
> *	Fat-free ice cream;

Why don't we stick to the topic? Do you have an intelligent reply or are 
you going to shoot your mouth off? Or Maybe you can share something 
better with us, all knowing and wise one.

Aaron





Thread