1995-02-08 - Re: skronk

Header Data

From: cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Todd Masco)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 585db3f8c49165e77031efb057ede5b35b7d8a6bbd16bb65345ce1be9556dfd8
Message ID: <199502082006.PAA21801@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: <9502081137.ZM28317@warp.mcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-08 20:09:54 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:09:54 PST

Raw message

From: cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Todd Masco)
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:09:54 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: skronk
In-Reply-To: <9502081137.ZM28317@warp.mcom.com>
Message-ID: <199502082006.PAA21801@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <9502081137.ZM28317@warp.mcom.com>,
Kipp E.B. Hickman <kipp@warp.mcom.com> wrote:
>You are right here. However, our observation is that an interesting chunk of
>the world is moving towards using X.509 based certificate infrastructures for
>many things. 

AFAIK, the only interesting chunk is those corps that want some form of
"True Name" (and PKP/RSADSI, of course).

Everybody else hates them with a passion.  The Hastur crypto toolkit will
support them, but they'll be viewed as special cases of web-of-trust
signed keys with time-outs.
- --
Todd Masco     | "Change is not only necessary, it is inevitable."
cactus@hks.net |                          - Frank Zappa
     Cactus' Homepage
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBLzkkGCoZzwIn1bdtAQE6BAF+LLnnx8PG3kIHOmK7kcXoKEThYeXtZgG2
Ke9yqab4kXHMyMSlAPT94P1eicQvhWDJ
=BC1t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread