1995-02-08 - Re: skronk

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: “Kipp E.B. Hickman” <kipp@warp.mcom.com>
Message Hash: a96a86896cbfaedb56ba431b094fcb1eedbfd3d90b58187ca36f503309421a41
Message ID: <9502081947.AA10312@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <9502081137.ZM28317@warp.mcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-08 19:48:24 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:48:24 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:48:24 PST
To: "Kipp E.B. Hickman" <kipp@warp.mcom.com>
Subject: Re: skronk
In-Reply-To: <9502081137.ZM28317@warp.mcom.com>
Message-ID: <9502081947.AA10312@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



I agree with much of what you say until you hit this:

"Kipp E.B. Hickman" says:
> You are right here. However, our observation is that an interesting chunk of
> the world is moving towards using X.509 based certificate infrastructures for
> many things.

Like who? Certainly not the internet standards people, no matter what
certain people might tell you. The X.509 body may still be twitching
but I don't think its heart is beating any longer.

Perry

Thread

• Return to February 1995

• Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>”
• Return to “cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Todd Masco)”
• Return to “eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)”
• Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”
• Return to “kipp@warp.mcom.com (Kipp E.B. Hickman)”
• Return to ““Kipp E.B. Hickman” <kipp@warp.mcom.com>”
• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”

• Return to “strick@techwood.org”

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 10:52:26 PST) - Re: skronk - strick@techwood.org
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:37:44 PST) - Re: skronk - “Kipp E.B. Hickman” <kipp@warp.mcom.com>
      • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:48:24 PST) - Re: skronk - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:55:34 PST) - Re: skronk - Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
        • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 13:09:44 PST) - Re: skronk - “Kipp E.B. Hickman” <kipp@warp.mcom.com>
          • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 20:23:40 PST) - Re: skronk - eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
      • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:09:54 PST) - Re: skronk - cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Todd Masco)
      • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 20:14:43 PST) - Re: skronk - eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
    • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:25:47 PST) - Re: skronk - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 10:04:03 PST) - Re: skronk - kipp@warp.mcom.com (Kipp E.B. Hickman)