cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-02-22 - Re: Internet Privacy Guaranteed ad (POTP Jr.)

Header Data

From: Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
To: IPG Sales <ipgsales@cyberstation.net>
Message Hash: 292fb3b088961778d1193de809e7a88b0e36ca8e410e6a7296a453274a247544
Message ID: <199602220355.VAA10221@grendel.texas.net>
Reply To: <9602211404.AA16345@alpha>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-22 14:51:41 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 22:51:41 +0800

Raw message

From: Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 22:51:41 +0800
To: IPG Sales <ipgsales@cyberstation.net>
Subject: Re: Internet Privacy Guaranteed ad (POTP Jr.)
In-Reply-To: <9602211404.AA16345@alpha>
Message-ID: <199602220355.VAA10221@grendel.texas.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


IPG Sales <ipgsales@cyberstation.net> said:

IS> Mike, the keys are encrypted with an OTP that only the intended
IS> recipient can open - a special, subsystem used for that purpose
IS> only - employing the same techniquers, but entirely separate and
IS> apart from the primary user system - any inteceptor would have to
IS> break trhe system, which we claim is impossible.

	So you send not one, but two sets of one time pads out of
band?  Well, if _both_ OTP shipments are intercepted and duplicated,
what keeps the interceptor from getting the keys?

-- 
#include <disclaimer.h>                               /* Sten Drescher */
Unsolicited email advertisements will be proofread for a US$100/page fee.

Thread