cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-06-05 - Re: Multiple Remailers at a site?

Header Data

From: nelson@crynwr.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0dfa4b2fff1a443bdb926c6e5a19c1a9d786983ef7674fcbc59fc73346ca7481
Message ID: <19960604232157.2053.qmail@ns.crynwr.com>
Reply To: <199606020659.XAA25720@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-05 08:25:36 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 16:25:36 +0800

Raw message

From: nelson@crynwr.com
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 16:25:36 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Multiple Remailers at a site?
In-Reply-To: <199606020659.XAA25720@toad.com>
Message-ID: <19960604232157.2053.qmail@ns.crynwr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Scott Brickner writes:

 > If the remailer does a good job with the delays and shuffling, then
 > it becomes difficult for the analyst to match message a with
 > message b, leaving him with what he already knew (that A and
 > RemailerX have a common interest, as to B and RemailerX, but the
 > interests may be wholly unrelated).

Nope.  Not if each of them runs a remailer.  That's why mixmaster is
SO WONDERFUL.

-russ <nelson@crynwr.com>    http://www.crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr Software   | Crynwr Software sells packet driver support | PGP ok
11 Grant St.      | +1 315 268 1925 voice | It's no mistake to err on
Potsdam, NY 13676 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | the side of freedom.

Thread